A few weeks ago mrspao suggested that she gets me a DSLR for my birthday as she was so enjoying her “girly cam” and figured that I should have a nice camera as well that was a bit more well blokey and a good hobby that she approves of me getting into.
So since then I have been having a nose round and am now convinced that Nikon and Canon as the market leaders have rigged things deliberately to ensure that comparisons are difficult to perform in an unbiased way.
My reasoning behind this is based on one factor alone: cost.
In price order DSLRs go as follows (note that this ignoring any newly announced models and just going on availability for the last six months and using prices from a well known UK camera dealer for body only – so no lenses, finally note that these prices are as found on many high streets in the UK – shopping around can make a reasonable difference).
Nikon D50: £329
Canon EOS 350D: £439
Nikon D70S: £549
Canon EOS 30D: £849
Nikon D200: £1149
As you can see price wise there are no direct comparisons.
So when scouting round the internet and various photographic magazines you see articles entitled “30D vs D200 – we rate the best camera” or “D50 against 350D: which is the best”, you always (yes I mean always) find that the winner is always the most expensive and consequently better specced of the two. Therefore it is not hard to find out which reviewers are partisan to a particular system. At the end of the day the lenses and accessories between Nikon and Canon (or Pentax, Sony, Olympus etc) are not interchangeable and so you are buying into a manufacturers system and there you will remain as you invest in lenses/flashes/chargers etc.
The only people its a no brainer for are those who have already invested in a system, as Canon fit lenses from a few years back will fit modern DSLRs and likewise with Nikon. Doing an upgrade is fairly trivial – its either direct replacement models or go up a tier (ie 350D -> 30D etc).
For the person just dipping their toes into the field it can be a nightmare, there are two main choices (yes there are others but they are the two big boys in the field) and you ask anyone who has invested in a system and to be frank it can get quite religious. My personal feeling is to go for the best body with a kit lens that you can afford. The kit lens is thrown in at minimal extra cost for a reason – its cheap, its cheerfull BUT it is enough to get you going and can be replaced at a later date, with a better lens at a varable cost dependant on what you want.
Lenses I am told do not have to be hideously expensive, other manufacturers such as Tamron and Sigma make lenses with mounts for most brands and are according to reviews on the internet and in magazines quite acceptable (in most cases) and not necessarily as expensive. Though once you start factoring in image stabilisers (gyroscopes that float the optical elements inside the lens) and high speed frictionless motors (that allow you to overide autofocus by simply twisting the focussing ring without disengaging the autofocus) then the prices can and do seriously creep up.
As for me, well a decision has been reached after consultation with SWMBO, independant (by SWMBO and I) non comparative review digestion, advice from a couple of friends who are camera nuts and finally a purchase has been made. Will keep stumn for now though. Lets just say that I am muchly happy with my “blokey cam”.
Thankyou mrspao.